Monday
Jan112010

Rita Mulcahy Practice Exam - First Pass

From Dwayne Wright - Certified FileMaker 10 Developer
WEB: www.dwaynewright.com
EMAIL: info@dwaynewright.com
TWITTER: dwaynewright
YOUTUBE: FileMakerThoughts

I took a rather disappointing class at Bellevue College called PMP Prep and it required us to purchase the exam prep book and flip chart products by Rita Mulcahy. Although we were required to take practice exams from this very expensive Rita Mulcahy book resource, we didn’t adequately cover the exams in class. In fact, I don’t think we covered more than a dozen or so questions from the 409 questions that make up the resource.

I don’t care for the Rita Mulcahy resources much, I find them full of really blunt edges. However, there are those that have passed the PMP exam that praise the Rita Mulcahy test questions, so I’ve continued to use that portion of her book.

One of the horrible ideas for the Bellevue College class was to take practice exams before covering the material. Then we would look at slide after slide after slide and if time allowed, we would look at a question or two from each practice exam. So my scores for the first pass of the 409 questions is unimpressive.

409 Questions
255 Correct
154 Incorrect
=========
62% Score

Since then I’ve spent more time in the PMBOK and in Kim Heldman’s PMP Guide. I like them both actually but the real help in my study efforts has been resources from the PM PrepCast. For $99, you get over 123 iTunes Video/Audio/PDF resources and it is over 48 hours of content. I’ve been listening to this content on my morning runs and in the car when I can. It has been an exceptional value and I recommend it highly. I have just purchased the $30 additional resource for PMP Formulas and have been delighted with the quality of that resource as well!

Anyway, I just took a deeper review of the questions I missed from Rita Mulcahy and encouraged about my progress. What I did was look at those 154 missed questions again and write my own comments about them. I’ll do this again as I take her practice tests in the future and my goal is to improve my score each time. Right now, just focusing on those 154 missed questions ...

154 Incorrect Initially
71 Questions I Got Correct In The Second Pass
83 Questions I Missed Again In The Second Pass

I didn’t do a really deep analysis on those 83 questions again but I did mark which ones I wanted to research further (23) and which ones I thought were flat out bad questions (21). The bad questions either seem to be totally wrong or the explanations about the question were extremely poor and useless to me.

I decided to take this approach for all the practice exams I’m taking and I’m taking quite a few. I plan on taking a bunch of practice exams and then really analyze the questions I miss. Being a database developer, this isn’t that hard to do. After 3 months of this, I think I’ll be prepared for the exam!
=
More info about the author and FileMaker in general, contact me at info@dwaynewright.com.

© 2009 - Dwayne Wright - dwaynewright.com

The material on this document is offered AS IS. There is NO REPRESENTATION OR WARRANTY, expressed or implied, nor does any other contributor to this document. WARRANTIES OF MERCHANT ABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMED. Consequential and incidental damages are expressly excluded. FileMaker Pro is the registered trademark of FileMaker Inc.

ADVERTISEMENT ==================
Help support this blog by considering a donating to its ongoing growth. For more details, please visit http://www.dwaynewright.com/donate.html

Thursday
Jan072010

PMP Practice Test Tidbits: Forecasts Are Not Planning Related

From Dwayne Wright - Certified FileMaker 10 Developer
WEB: www.dwaynewright.com
EMAIL: info@dwaynewright.com
TWITTER: dwaynewright
YOUTUBE: FileMakerThoughts

Another question I missed in a practice exam was that forecasting is not part of the planning process group. Seemed quite odd to me that creating a forecast for something is totally different than planning to do something about it. The correct answer to the question was that it resides within the Monitor and Control process group. In researching this, I had trouble finding anything definitive until I hit upon the PMBOK on page 184.

Here you can see that forecasting is indeed planted firmly into the Monitor / Control process and not the Planning stage. Forecasting is dependent upon data at the time of the forecast using acquired data. That clearly suggests M/C because you have no actual data in the planning process. Makes sense now that I think about it but the knee jerk reaction was to place it within the planning process group.
=
More info about the author and FileMaker in general, contact me at info@dwaynewright.com.

© 2009 - Dwayne Wright - dwaynewright.com

The material on this document is offered AS IS. There is NO REPRESENTATION OR WARRANTY, expressed or implied, nor does any other contributor to this document. WARRANTIES OF MERCHANT ABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMED. Consequential and incidental damages are expressly excluded. FileMaker Pro is the registered trademark of FileMaker Inc.

ADVERTISEMENT ==================
Help support this blog by considering a donating to its ongoing growth. For more details, please visit http://www.dwaynewright.com/donate.html

Thursday
Jan072010

PMP Practice Test Tidbits: Analogous Estimating Trick Questions

From Dwayne Wright - Certified FileMaker 10 Developer
WEB: www.dwaynewright.com
EMAIL: info@dwaynewright.com
TWITTER: dwaynewright
YOUTUBE: FileMakerThoughts

PMP Practice Test Tidbits

I’ve run across some tricky questions with tricky answers in some of my PMP practice exam tests in the area of analogous estimating. Most practice tests seem to lean more to the aspects of top down and expert judgment when describing analogous estimating than they do the historical costs.

I missed one practice test exam question because I chose an answer mentioning historical costs. The book in which the practice test came from clearly says on page 190 that analogous estimating uses historical information ... the answer response to the question I missed says that it does not. So which is it or is it just a crappy question?

Looking at the answer a second time, I see it said “Uses actual detailed historical costs” and I can only assume the inclusion of “actual detailed” is the part of the answer that makes it “less true”. More true (evidently) was the answer “Uses Top-Down Estimating Techniques”.


=
More info about the author and FileMaker in general, contact me at info@dwaynewright.com.

© 2009 - Dwayne Wright - dwaynewright.com

The material on this document is offered AS IS. There is NO REPRESENTATION OR WARRANTY, expressed or implied, nor does any other contributor to this document. WARRANTIES OF MERCHANT ABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMED. Consequential and incidental damages are expressly excluded. FileMaker Pro is the registered trademark of FileMaker Inc.

ADVERTISEMENT ==================
Help support this blog by considering a donating to its ongoing growth. For more details, please visit http://www.dwaynewright.com/donate.html

Thursday
Jan072010

No Go For Padding Estimates

From Dwayne Wright - Certified FileMaker 10 Developer
WEB: www.dwaynewright.com
EMAIL: info@dwaynewright.com
TWITTER: dwaynewright
YOUTUBE: FileMakerThoughts

In the real world, padding an estimate is not uncommon. This is mainly to account for unknowns and it is great to come in under your estimate. This is akin to the way Scotty in Star Trek episodes always pads his repair estimates to Captain Kirk. It was a bit of a shift to learn that PMI considers this practice as either a lack of competence or lack or integrity. All the PMI practice tests that I have looked at have a question like this and the correct answer is usually about some sort of research in the identify risks area.
=
More info about the author and FileMaker in general, contact me at info@dwaynewright.com.

© 2009 - Dwayne Wright - dwaynewright.com

The material on this document is offered AS IS. There is NO REPRESENTATION OR WARRANTY, expressed or implied, nor does any other contributor to this document. WARRANTIES OF MERCHANT ABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMED. Consequential and incidental damages are expressly excluded. FileMaker Pro is the registered trademark of FileMaker Inc.

ADVERTISEMENT ==================
Help support this blog by considering a donating to its ongoing growth. For more details, please visit http://www.dwaynewright.com/donate.html

Sunday
Jan032010

A READER ASKS: Help In Defining Customers Needs

From Dwayne Wright - Certified FileMaker 10 Developer
WEB: www.dwaynewright.com
EMAIL: info@dwaynewright.com
TWITTER: dwaynewright
YOUTUBE: FileMakerThoughts

A READER ASKS
I received the study guide (Kim Heldman book PMP Exam Guide), and have gone through Chapter 3. Is there something specific in that chapter that will help me define what we need to know about our customer? Do you recommend any database books that will help me define what information would be helpful for us to have from our customers?

I'm feeling a little overwhelmed and I'm not getting a lot of support from my peers.

-------
DWAYNE RESPONDS
If there is a database book that does a good job at getting information about defining customers needs (particularly when they are not that interested), I’ve missed it. The subject is chatted about somewhat in “Database Design For Mere Mortals” and that might be a book you would want to check out from the local library. It has been around forever but it does hold up well. Still, I don’t think any database book is going to really help you here.

Kim’s book does a classic overview of collecting requirements straight from the PMBOK. This being interviews, focus groups, facilitated workshops, group creativity techniques, questionnaires, surveys and prototypes. Problem is, none of these are particularly effective tools for the uninspired audience.

I don’t remember which podcast I heard this from but I think it might be applicable to your situation in getting support from your peers. It said something on the order of ...

“EVERYONE LISTENS TO RADIO STATION WIIFM”

The call letters of this mythical radio station meaning “What’s In It For Me!”. That is a little harsh but does ring true when collecting, organizing and gaining approval of requirements. What you might have to do is employ your sales skills for helping these folks visualize the end product. Back when I sold cars, I heard it described as “Selling The Sizzle And Not The Steak”!

It might be time consuming but you might want to go back to chapter 2 of Kims book on page 66. Here you can find a discussion of the Statement Of Work and how it breaks down into describing the business need, product scope description and the strategic plan.

Getting this information and tailoring to WIIFM may do the trick for getting approval for the project. It might help by looking at software products out there that come close to what you want in your customized application. Another thing I would do is document everything you do NOT like about your current system.

=
More info about the author and FileMaker in general, contact me at info@dwaynewright.com.

© 2009 - Dwayne Wright - dwaynewright.com

The material on this document is offered AS IS. There is NO REPRESENTATION OR WARRANTY, expressed or implied, nor does any other contributor to this document. WARRANTIES OF MERCHANT ABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMED. Consequential and incidental damages are expressly excluded. FileMaker Pro is the registered trademark of FileMaker Inc.

ADVERTISEMENT ==================
Help support this blog by considering a donating to its ongoing growth. For more details, please visit http://www.dwaynewright.com/donate.html

Page 1 ... 2 3 4 5 6 ... 10 Next 5 Entries »